So if you have not fully understood something in the paper, do not hesitate to ask for clarification. I make a decision after drafting my review. Then, right in the introduction, you can often recognize whether the authors considered the full context of their topic. Its ok for a paper to say something that you dont agree with. The decision comes along during reading and making notes.
There are a few aspects that i make sure to address, though i cover a lot more ground as well. What is the paper about? How is it structured? I also pay attention to the schemes and figures if they are well designed and organized, then in most cases the entire paper has also been carefully thought out. Normally, a peer review takes me 1 or 2 days, including reading the supporting information Buy now Recommendation In Research Paper
I try to be constructive by suggesting ways to improve the problematic aspects, if that is possible, and also try to hit a calm and friendly but also neutral and objective tone. It is also very important that the authors guide you through the whole article and explain every table, every figure, and every scheme. Major comments may include suggesting a missing control that could make or break the authors conclusions or an important experiment that would help the story, though i try not to recommend extremely difficult experiments that would be beyond the scope of the paper or take forever. At this first stage, i try to be as open-minded as i can. At least early on, it is a good idea to be open to review invitations so that you can see what unfinished papers look like and get familiar with the review process Recommendation In Research Paper Buy now
Passing this identity test helps ensure that my review is sufficiently balanced and fair. Just pretend that its your own research and figure out what experiments you would do and how you would interpret the data. Then i follow a routine that will help me evaluate this. The only other factor i pay attention to is the scientific integrity of the journal. If ive never heard of the authors, and particularly if theyre from a less developed nation, then im also more likely to accept the invitation.
Waiting another day always seems to improve the review. I should also have a good idea of the hypothesis and context within the first few pages, and it matters whether the hypothesis makes sense or is interesting Buy Recommendation In Research Paper at a discount
Then i read the methods section very carefully. Third, i consider whether the results or the proposed methodology have some potential broader applicability or relevance, because in my opinion this is important. After i have finished reading the manuscript, i let it sink in for a day or so and then i try to decide which aspects really matter. Unless the journal uses a structured review format, i usually begin my review with a general statement of my understanding of the paper and what it claims, followed by a paragraph offering an overall assessment. It will help you make the right decision.
That makes things a lot harder for editors of the less prestigious journals, and thats why i am more inclined to take on reviews from them Buy Online Recommendation In Research Paper
This helps me to distinguish between major and minor issues and also to group them thematically as i draft my review. I try to link any criticism i have either to a page number or a quotation from the manuscript to ensure that my argument is understood. I try to be constructive by suggesting ways to improve the problematic aspects, if that is possible, and also try to hit a calm and friendly but also neutral and objective tone. Short reviews translate into strong recommendations and vice versa. I print out the paper, as i find it easier to make comments on the printed pages than on an electronic reader.
First, i check the authors publication records in pubmed to get a feel for their expertise in the field Buy Recommendation In Research Paper Online at a discount
My review begins with a paragraph summarizing the paper. I then typically go through my first draft looking at the marked-up manuscript again to make sure i didnt leave out anything important. I also want to know whether the authors conclusions are adequately supported by the results. I would not want to review for a journal that does not offer an unbiased review process. Discussion i focus on most are context and whether the authors make claims that overreach the data.
I solved it by making the decision to review one journal article per week, putting a slot in my calendar for it, and promptly declining subsequent requests after the weekly slot is filledor offering the next available opening to the editor Recommendation In Research Paper For Sale
I use annotations that i made in the pdf to start writing my review that way i never forget to mention something that occurred to me while reading the paper. Major comments may include suggesting a missing control that could make or break the authors conclusions or an important experiment that would help the story, though i try not to recommend extremely difficult experiments that would be beyond the scope of the paper or take forever. First, i consider how the question being addressed fits into the current status of our knowledge. Conclusions that are overstated or out of sync with the findings will adversely impact my review and recommendations. Then, i divide the review in two sections with bullet points, first listing the most critical aspects that the authors must address to better demonstrate the quality and novelty of the paper and then more minor points such as misspelling and figure format For Sale Recommendation In Research Paper
I read the digital version with an open word processing file, keeping a list of major items and minor items and making notes as i go. Bear in mind that one of the most dangerous traps a reviewer can fall into is failing to recognize and acknowledge their own bias. Discussion i focus on most are context and whether the authors make claims that overreach the data. My reviews usually start out with a short summary and a highlight of the strengths of the manuscript before briefly listing the weaknesses that i believe should be addressed. Finally, i am more inclined to review for journals with double-blind reviewing practices and journals that are run by academic societies, because those are both things that i want to support and encourage Sale Recommendation In Research Paper